<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Joe Sacramento &#187; software bugs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joesacramento.com/tag/software-bugs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joesacramento.com</link>
	<description>Hey everyone, where are all those jobs?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:49:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>iMayor Update: Bug in accountability feature threatens to derail unit</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2010/02/08/imayor-accountability-malfunction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.joesacramento.com/2010/02/08/imayor-accountability-malfunction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Lead Story]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kevin johnson mayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software bugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=2860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last we reported on iMayor, he was feverishly working his SAMI and courting the Maloof brothers. We reckon investors can&#8217;t be too thrilled about the latest bug that appears to have rendered his accountability feature all but useless..?
The SacBee is reporting today Johnson wants Sac voters to decide on a new budget analyst position. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.joesacramento.com/./wp-content/uploads/iMayor_logo_joesacramento.com.jpg"><img style="float: left;" title="iMayor_logo_joesacramento.com" src="http://www.joesacramento.com/./wp-content/uploads/iMayor_logo_joesacramento.com.jpg" alt="" width="159" height="181" /></a>The last we reported on iMayor, he was feverishly working his SAMI and courting the Maloof brothers. We reckon investors can&#8217;t be too thrilled about the latest bug that appears to have rendered his accountability feature all but useless..?</p>
<p>The SacBee is reporting today Johnson wants Sac voters to decide on a new budget analyst position. Can you hear the crowd booing? Evidently this is a first in Sac politics. Course the mayor could have just asked the council for support, but ever since they swatted his free budget audit offer into the cheap seats a ways back, he&#8217;s been a little gun shy. Weird. He was never shy about pulling the trigger in his NBA days.<span id="more-2860"></span></p>
<p>Anyway, it&#8217;s safe to say something has gone terribly wrong when the boss is suddenly deferring everything to the people for vote. This  &#8220;let the people decide&#8221; position iMayor has suddenly taken on everything is wonky. After all, this<em> is</em> the iMayor unit who said in response to the recent strong arm mayor initiative fail: &#8220;accountability has been asked to wait in line.&#8221; Weird because when he was stumping for votes back in October of 2008 he promised a vote for him would usher accountability to the <span style="text-decoration: underline;">front</span> of the line. A vote for iMayor Johnson denoted a vote for accountability, right? Well that&#8217;s we THOUGHT.</p>
<p>Folks are perplexed. At this point they&#8217;re beginning to ask:  does this bot want to be mayor or not? Isn&#8217;t iMayor Johnson the one who told voters he was in a unique position to shake things up at city hall because he was NOT a politician? I remember him saying at his Natomas &#8220;town hall&#8221; (actually it was mostly a sales presentation)  &#8220;If I&#8217;m elected it won&#8217;t be politics as usual&#8221; in Sac town.. or something like that. He went on about how he didn&#8217;t have any lobbyist bread to butter or political ties. Fourth generation Sacramentan set to return decorum, accountability, and transparency to city hall.</p>
<p>Someone needs to tell iMayor that simply deferring decisions to voters does not an effective leader model make. That&#8217;s a populist approach to governance any donkey could perpetrate.  Why even have a mayor if he doesn&#8217;t want to facilitate key decisions ?  Where&#8217;s the accountable city government? Where&#8217;s the transparency? Where&#8217;s that stab into the heart of &#8220;politics as usual&#8221; iMayor  promised? We&#8217;re not seeing it. All we&#8217;re seeing is indifference and deference. Time for iMayor&#8217;s contingent to fix the bugs and restart the application pool.</p>
<p>But then maybe people are asking  too much from the mayor who recently referred to Willie Brown as his &#8220;idol.&#8221;  All due respect to Willie Brown, but he isn&#8217;t exactly &#8220;idol&#8221; material&#8230;. unless your idol bar is dangerously low &#8230; or your operating system is on the fritz&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.joesacramento.com/2010/02/08/imayor-accountability-malfunction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
