
I don’t usually report on national stories, but I think you’ll find this one interesting. According to Slatest, “two children in Valparaiso, Indiana, were each charged yesterday with two felonies after they were caught sexting (sending a text message with a nude picture attached) last week.. The students “were caught when the 13-year-old girl’s cell phone rang in class, and her teacher confiscated it,” the reported yesterday. “The girl cried that she would get in trouble because a 12-year-old boy sent her a ‘dirty picture.’” The boy had sent a picture of his genitals to the girl, who responded by sending him a picture of her naked. The students were both charged with two felonies: child exploitation and possession of child pornography. Both the charges and the sexting phenomenon have raised a lot of questions, especially considering that “four percent of cell phone-owning teens 12 to 17 say they’ve sent nude or nearly nude images or videos of themselves via text,” the Chicago Tribune reported. If the students are convicted on the charged, they will also be required to register as sex offenders.
I am not condoning teen sexting, but these charges seem ridiculously harsh to me. In fact I don’t even think law enforcement should have been involved. Seems to me our law enforcement resources have FAR bigger fish to fry than prosecuting Johnny and Suzie’s “show-me-yours-and-I’ll-show-you-mine” sext affair. Why not just warn them, suspend them, and be done with it? Child sextploitation exploitation?? Child pornography?? Um, no. More like poor judgment.
If these kids are made to register as sex offenders the DA in Chicago will have completely ABUSED the sex offender registry. It was never created to humiliate, debase, and ruin the lives of young children. Who the ##$@ is making the laws in this country? Why are we standing by and doing nothing as legislators turn America into a communist state?

great article mark. i kind of liken it to when teens would go to the drive-in to make-out. i mean really, are the feds going to charge them with statutory rape? sure teen sex shouldn’t necessarily be promoted, but come on. we all did and we move on. also, the more you punish, the more they will want to do it. its the “its not the kill, its the thrill of the chase” syndrome. nonetheless, i wholeheartedly agree with your take on this issue.
Funny, I just saw a repeat of a “To Catch A Predator” a few minutes ago…
I always thought the laws regarding “possession” of images on one’s cell phone or computer or hard drive were interesting/strange because it is so amazingly easy to drop files onto someone’s device without their knowing it. I mean, viruses are spread every minute of every day, all usually under the nose of the victim and quite possibly without their knowing what is going on.
When the teacher took possession of the cell phone, was she guilty of being “in possession” of the image(s)?
Obviously this is absurd, but laws need to be written carefully so that they don’t ensnare people for whom the laws are not intended to prosecute.
Like these kids…