Comments on: Talk about circular reasoning http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/11/25/talk-about-circular-reasoning/ Have courage, support your opinions with your real name Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:07:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: M. Johnston http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/11/25/talk-about-circular-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-14422 M. Johnston Sun, 29 Nov 2009 01:54:10 +0000 http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=2533#comment-14422 Chani, I could not agree with you more. In fact the more I learn about science, the deeper my faith in God grows. Of course there is an intelligent designer. It's so obvious. Our emotional fragility alone is enough to convince me--and that isn't even the tip of the iceberg Chani, I could not agree with you more. In fact the more I learn about science, the deeper my faith in God grows. Of course there is an intelligent designer. It’s so obvious. Our emotional fragility alone is enough to convince me–and that isn’t even the tip of the iceberg

]]> By: Chani http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/11/25/talk-about-circular-reasoning/comment-page-1/#comment-13808 Chani Thu, 26 Nov 2009 01:50:51 +0000 http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=2533#comment-13808 I just read a book called "Genius of the Beast" by Howard Bloom and that sounds like a comment he might make. The thing is that he's smart enough to know that science and religion are not incompatible. In fact, they are complementary. This plane is indeed mechanical if that is the only dimension we acknowledge. There is so much more depth than that. What proves that more than science? ~* I just read a book called “Genius of the Beast” by Howard Bloom and that sounds like a comment he might make. The thing is that he’s smart enough to know that science and religion are not incompatible. In fact, they are complementary. This plane is indeed mechanical if that is the only dimension we acknowledge. There is so much more depth than that. What proves that more than science?

~*

]]>