<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sacramento is amongst worse water waste offenders in nation.. but you&#8217;d never know it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/</link>
	<description>Have courage, support your opinions with your real name</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sharward</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8885</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sharward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8885</guid>
		<description>I think the overall point is that this region lacks beautification measures often seen in other communities. Of course there are areas of the state that are more likely to have more natural vegitation along the freeways -- the routes to Tahoe are an example of this. But I think the overall point is that there is generally a lack of landscaping along our freeways, and I agree, that is really unfortunate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the overall point is that this region lacks beautification measures often seen in other communities. Of course there are areas of the state that are more likely to have more natural vegitation along the freeways &#8212; the routes to Tahoe are an example of this. But I think the overall point is that there is generally a lack of landscaping along our freeways, and I agree, that is really unfortunate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Community Dis-Organizer</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8881</link>
		<dc:creator>Community Dis-Organizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8881</guid>
		<description>Hey Kahuna..that&#039;s called Darwinism... Many places have trees next to the interstate.....or highways...just take a drive to Tahoe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Kahuna..that&#8217;s called Darwinism&#8230; Many places have trees next to the interstate&#8230;..or highways&#8230;just take a drive to Tahoe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigKahuna</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8878</link>
		<dc:creator>BigKahuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8878</guid>
		<description>Joe, you don&#039;t want trees near Interstates - cars tend to crash into them and people die. As an aside, I&#039;ve always admired the new city of Citrus Heights for its beautifully landscaped center divides and other areas around the city. Big props for Citrus Heights and its wonderful landscaping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, you don&#8217;t want trees near Interstates &#8211; cars tend to crash into them and people die. As an aside, I&#8217;ve always admired the new city of Citrus Heights for its beautifully landscaped center divides and other areas around the city. Big props for Citrus Heights and its wonderful landscaping.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sharward</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8858</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sharward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8858</guid>
		<description>Determine the nearest intersection, then send e-mail to [ 311 -at- cityofsacramento -dot- org ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Determine the nearest intersection, then send e-mail to [ 311 -at- cityofsacramento -dot- org ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8856</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8856</guid>
		<description>What about Arena Boulevard sidewalk (south side)?? 4 foot high weeds growing out of the sidewalk itself. Looks like South Central</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Arena Boulevard sidewalk (south side)?? 4 foot high weeds growing out of the sidewalk itself. Looks like South Central</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sharward</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8849</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sharward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8849</guid>
		<description>Subject: RE: Weed Abatement Needed: 4000 Block of Truxel Road
From: &quot;Keith Sharward&quot; &quot;Keith Sharward (WRCA)&quot; [ Keith -at- WitterRanchCommunity -dot- org ]
Date: Sun, June 14, 2009 5:35 pm
To: &quot;311 Call Center&quot; [ 311 -at- cityofsacramento -dot- org ]


Sorry for the delay, Gina -- I only just had a chance to drive by that area today, and you are correct -- the weeds were in fact recently cut all along that area. It looks a thousand times better than the abandoned wasteland it looked like before -- although the parkway strip still looks pretty bad with weeds that are now much shorter. 

I am still interested in getting answers to my earlier questions when you have a moment. 

Again, thank you for your service,

Keith Sharward
Co-founder and Board Member, Witter Ranch Community Alliance - http://www.WitterRanchCommunity.org
Member, Natomas Crime &amp; Safety Leadership Team 
Supporter, Angelique Ashby for City Council 2010 - http://www.AngeliqueAshby.com


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Weed Abatement Needed: 4000 Block of Truxel Road
From: &quot;311 Call Center&quot; [ 311  -at- cityofsacramento -dot- org
Date: Thu, June 11, 2009 8:10 am
To: &quot;Keith Sharward (WRCA)&quot; [ Keith -at- WitterRanchCommunity -dot- org ]

Hello -

We have had tremendous difficulty out in this area. The city (Fire Prevention with subcontractors) has been out abating some lots, however there have been others (Prosper and Innovator is a perfect example), that took us nearly 6 weeks to identify and contact the responsible party. I was advised yesterday coincidentally that this area was disced. I am not sure if you have been by there in the past 24 hours. If you drive by and I do not have accurate information, please let me know. The original tracking number for this is: 1-14520072 (date opened 4/21/09).

Again, if my information from yesterday is not accurate, let me know

Thank you,

Gina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subject: RE: Weed Abatement Needed: 4000 Block of Truxel Road<br />
From: &#8220;Keith Sharward&#8221; &#8220;Keith Sharward (WRCA)&#8221; [ Keith -at- WitterRanchCommunity -dot- org ]<br />
Date: Sun, June 14, 2009 5:35 pm<br />
To: &#8220;311 Call Center&#8221; [ 311 -at- cityofsacramento -dot- org ]</p>
<p>Sorry for the delay, Gina &#8212; I only just had a chance to drive by that area today, and you are correct &#8212; the weeds were in fact recently cut all along that area. It looks a thousand times better than the abandoned wasteland it looked like before &#8212; although the parkway strip still looks pretty bad with weeds that are now much shorter. </p>
<p>I am still interested in getting answers to my earlier questions when you have a moment. </p>
<p>Again, thank you for your service,</p>
<p>Keith Sharward<br />
Co-founder and Board Member, Witter Ranch Community Alliance &#8211; <a href="http://www.WitterRanchCommunity.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.WitterRanchCommunity.org</a><br />
Member, Natomas Crime &amp; Safety Leadership Team<br />
Supporter, Angelique Ashby for City Council 2010 &#8211; <a href="http://www.AngeliqueAshby.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.AngeliqueAshby.com</a></p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211; Original Message &#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
Subject: Re: Weed Abatement Needed: 4000 Block of Truxel Road<br />
From: &#8220;311 Call Center&#8221; [ 311  -at- cityofsacramento -dot- org<br />
Date: Thu, June 11, 2009 8:10 am<br />
To: "Keith Sharward (WRCA)" [ Keith -at- WitterRanchCommunity -dot- org ]</p>
<p>Hello -</p>
<p>We have had tremendous difficulty out in this area. The city (Fire Prevention with subcontractors) has been out abating some lots, however there have been others (Prosper and Innovator is a perfect example), that took us nearly 6 weeks to identify and contact the responsible party. I was advised yesterday coincidentally that this area was disced. I am not sure if you have been by there in the past 24 hours. If you drive by and I do not have accurate information, please let me know. The original tracking number for this is: 1-14520072 (date opened 4/21/09).</p>
<p>Again, if my information from yesterday is not accurate, let me know</p>
<p>Thank you,</p>
<p>Gina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reality</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8700</link>
		<dc:creator>Reality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8700</guid>
		<description>Plants on the side of the road in Natomas is never going to happen.  Sorry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plants on the side of the road in Natomas is never going to happen.  Sorry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8699</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8699</guid>
		<description>@ The Office of the President.  You&#039;re right about the quality of street vegetation in Irvine and San Jose, although, see Saron&#039;s comment above.  Those cities have immensely better street vegetation than that of Sacramento.  But then again, you&#039;re also comparing two cities with different economic demographics.  Irvine is a bubble, everyone knows that.  I cannot comment on San Jose because I&#039;ve had limited experience there.  Comparing Irvine to Sac is like comparing an apple to a fruit no one knows about.  But yes, the Sacramento roadways are disgusting.  Then again, we are talking about the plants on the side of the road.  We could ask the city to raise taxes again so we can pay for plants on the side of the road, but I&#039;d rather not.  It is interesting to see how much interest this has sparked since there about a billion other things more important in the world, or in Sacramento alone, than the status of the plants on the side of the road.  I&#039;d rather have our money go to schools and to those that need it than plant projects for our freeways.  Looks like I&#039;m alone here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ The Office of the President.  You&#8217;re right about the quality of street vegetation in Irvine and San Jose, although, see Saron&#8217;s comment above.  Those cities have immensely better street vegetation than that of Sacramento.  But then again, you&#8217;re also comparing two cities with different economic demographics.  Irvine is a bubble, everyone knows that.  I cannot comment on San Jose because I&#8217;ve had limited experience there.  Comparing Irvine to Sac is like comparing an apple to a fruit no one knows about.  But yes, the Sacramento roadways are disgusting.  Then again, we are talking about the plants on the side of the road.  We could ask the city to raise taxes again so we can pay for plants on the side of the road, but I&#8217;d rather not.  It is interesting to see how much interest this has sparked since there about a billion other things more important in the world, or in Sacramento alone, than the status of the plants on the side of the road.  I&#8217;d rather have our money go to schools and to those that need it than plant projects for our freeways.  Looks like I&#8217;m alone here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8686</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8686</guid>
		<description>Yeah Keith I am with you all the way. There are some areas in Natomas (especially where you mentioned) that are out of control. Good letter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Keith I am with you all the way. There are some areas in Natomas (especially where you mentioned) that are out of control. Good letter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Sharward</title>
		<link>http://www.joesacramento.com/2009/06/10/sacramento-blog-news-is-amongst-worse-water-waste-offenders-in-nation-but-youd-never-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8682</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Sharward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joesacramento.com/?p=1231#comment-8682</guid>
		<description>Testify!! 

I lived in the San Diego area in my teen years -- I visit the area often and I&#039;m always impressed with the look of things -- so much so that I&#039;m often so deeply disappointed by the contrast between there and here. 

Hey, speaking of fugly roads -- this post inspired me to finally get around to sending the following: 

From: Keith Sharward (WRCA) 
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:11 AM
To: City Operator, City Of Sacramento 
Subject: Weed Abatement Needed: 4000 Block of Truxel Road

I have noticed tremendous weed growth on the west side of Truxel Road between Prosper Road and Natomas Crossing Drive, including the landscaped parkway between the curb and sidewalk, and between the sidewalk and property line of the condominium development off Innovator Drive. 

Not only is it a horrible eyesore, I believe it is a fire hazard. 

The wide swath between the sidewalk and condominiums is the right of way for light rail in the future. 

Interestingly, the area south of the condominium complex -- adjacent to the neighborhood commercial village that includes Schools Federal Credit Union, Oshima Sushi, Starbucks, etc., is completely clear of weeds. The contrast is stunning! 

The parkway in question is lined with trees and bushes, but the weeds are now taller than the bushes. 

Who is responsible for the landscape maintenance of this area? Is there a landscaping district assessment being levied on nearby property owners for these features? Is the commercial village perhaps voluntarily landscaping the area fronting their property? 

I realize I have asked a number of questions... The priority is obvously the abatement of the fire hazard, so please tend to that first, followed by the more curious questions that I have expressed. I would like to hold the responsible party/parties accountable -- please don&#039;t close my case until all of my questions are answered, and I would appreciate a case number so that I can track progress. 

Thank you for your service. 

Respectfully, 

Keith Sharward 
Co-Founder and Board Member, Witter Ranch Community Alliance (http://www.WitterRanchCommunity.org) 
Member, Natomas Crime &amp; Safety Leadership Team 
Supporter, Angelique Ashby for City Council 2010 (http://www.AngeliqueAshby.com)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Testify!! </p>
<p>I lived in the San Diego area in my teen years &#8212; I visit the area often and I&#8217;m always impressed with the look of things &#8212; so much so that I&#8217;m often so deeply disappointed by the contrast between there and here. </p>
<p>Hey, speaking of fugly roads &#8212; this post inspired me to finally get around to sending the following: </p>
<p>From: Keith Sharward (WRCA)<br />
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 6:11 AM<br />
To: City Operator, City Of Sacramento<br />
Subject: Weed Abatement Needed: 4000 Block of Truxel Road</p>
<p>I have noticed tremendous weed growth on the west side of Truxel Road between Prosper Road and Natomas Crossing Drive, including the landscaped parkway between the curb and sidewalk, and between the sidewalk and property line of the condominium development off Innovator Drive. </p>
<p>Not only is it a horrible eyesore, I believe it is a fire hazard. </p>
<p>The wide swath between the sidewalk and condominiums is the right of way for light rail in the future. </p>
<p>Interestingly, the area south of the condominium complex &#8212; adjacent to the neighborhood commercial village that includes Schools Federal Credit Union, Oshima Sushi, Starbucks, etc., is completely clear of weeds. The contrast is stunning! </p>
<p>The parkway in question is lined with trees and bushes, but the weeds are now taller than the bushes. </p>
<p>Who is responsible for the landscape maintenance of this area? Is there a landscaping district assessment being levied on nearby property owners for these features? Is the commercial village perhaps voluntarily landscaping the area fronting their property? </p>
<p>I realize I have asked a number of questions&#8230; The priority is obvously the abatement of the fire hazard, so please tend to that first, followed by the more curious questions that I have expressed. I would like to hold the responsible party/parties accountable &#8212; please don&#8217;t close my case until all of my questions are answered, and I would appreciate a case number so that I can track progress. </p>
<p>Thank you for your service. </p>
<p>Respectfully, </p>
<p>Keith Sharward<br />
Co-Founder and Board Member, Witter Ranch Community Alliance (<a href="http://www.WitterRanchCommunity.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.WitterRanchCommunity.org</a>)<br />
Member, Natomas Crime &amp; Safety Leadership Team<br />
Supporter, Angelique Ashby for City Council 2010 (<a href="http://www.AngeliqueAshby.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.AngeliqueAshby.com</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
